SUPP vs. USMV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SUPP is actively managed, while USMV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUPP returned 15.79%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for USMV. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUPP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USMV.

Performance

SUPP vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPP achieves a 17.60% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 4.64% return.

SUPP

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -2.32%
• 6M: 12.78%
• YTD: 17.60%
• 1Y: 20.26%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USMV

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 4.64%
• 1Y: 7.10%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 9.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPP vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	17.60%	11.65%	10.95%	12.32%
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	4.64%	7.65%	15.74%	9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPP and USMV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between SUPP and USMV has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SUPP vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUPP	USMV
Industrials	52.4%	6.1%
Technology	37.0%	33.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	5.7%
Basic Materials	4.4%	2.4%
Communication Services	-	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.4%
Energy	-	2.7%
Financial Services	-	11.7%
Healthcare	-	12.6%
Real Estate	-	2.5%
Utilities	-	6.9%

Return for Risk

SUPP vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPP

SUPP Risk / Return Rank: 35
SUPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
SUPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SUPP Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SUPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SUPP Martin Ratio Rank: 45

USMV

USMV Risk / Return Rank: 28
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 25
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPP vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUPP	USMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.84	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.23	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.15	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	1.10	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	3.61	+2.20

SUPP vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPP and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SUPP vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPP drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPP and USMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPP	USMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.03%	-33.10%	+8.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.59%	-6.46%	-7.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.03%	-9.36%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.30%	-0.54%	-6.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-2.87%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	1.97%	+1.53%

Volatility

SUPP vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.54%. This indicates that SUPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUPP	USMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.11%	2.54%	+7.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.30%	6.22%	+13.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.09%	8.48%	+13.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.09%	12.36%	+7.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.09%	14.49%	+5.60%

SUPP vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUPP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUPP vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

SUPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than USMV's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	0.30%	0.35%	0.49%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	1.48%	1.49%	1.67%	1.82%	1.62%	1.26%	1.81%	1.88%	2.12%	1.77%	2.22%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPP and USMV in my portfolio?

SUPP and USMV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUPP or USMV?

SUPP has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to USMV (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPP dropped -25.03% vs USMV's -33.10%.

Which ETF is better, SUPP or USMV?

On 3-year performance, SUPP leads with 15.79% vs 11.43% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUPP or USMV?

Over the 3-year period, SUPP has performed better with a 15.79% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUPP or USMV?

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUPP or USMV?

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.30% for SUPP.

What is the main difference between SUPP and USMV?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SUPP and 0.15% for USMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SUPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.