SUPP vs. PWRD
SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUPP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
SUPP vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUPP achieves a 21.37% return, which is significantly higher than PWRD's 19.81% return.
SUPP
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 21.37%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUPP vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 21.37% | 4.38% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 19.81% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUPP and PWRD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUPP vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank
SUPP
PWRD
SUPP vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUPP | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUPP | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.32 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
SUPP vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUPP drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPP and PWRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUPP | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -14.12% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.74% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -3.17% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility
SUPP vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUPP | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 24.03% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 24.03% | -4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 24.03% | -4.59% |
SUPP vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SUPP and PWRD have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
SUPP vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison
SUPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.49% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUPP and PWRD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUPP and PWRD have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
SUPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
SUPP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities.
Find the right allocation for SUPP and PWRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer