SUPL vs. SQQQ
SUPL (ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SUPL is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUPL returned 8.11%/yr vs -49.83%/yr for SQQQ. Their -0.60 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SUPL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
SUPL vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUPL achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -34.61% return.
SUPL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- 28.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.69%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- 6M
- -32.40%
- YTD
- -34.61%
- 1Y
- -52.32%
- 3Y*
- -49.83%
- 5Y*
- -44.46%
- 10Y*
- -54.48%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.40B | $2.29B | $2.66B | |
| $76.25K | $64.52K | $42.91K |
SUPL vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF | 17.34% | 9.25% | -2.44% | 23.69% | -11.01% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -34.61% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 50.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUPL and SQQQ is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022 | -0.60 |
The correlation between SUPL and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.60 (all time) to -0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SUPL vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUPL
SQQQ
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
SUPL
SQQQ
-
Energy
SUPL
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
SUPL
SQQQ
-
Utilities
SUPL
SQQQ
-
Technology
SUPL
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
SUPL
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
SUPL
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SUPL
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SUPL
-
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
SUPL
-
SQQQ
Real Estate
SUPL
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUPL vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SUPL
SQQQ
SUPL vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUPL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.86 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | -0.81 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | -1.41 | +10.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUPL vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUPL drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPL and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUPL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -100.00% | +75.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -61.03% | +51.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.71% | -92.51% | +70.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -100.00% | +95.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -92.78% | +86.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 35.08% | -32.02% |
Volatility
SUPL vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) is 4.09%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 20.82%. This indicates that SUPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUPL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 20.82% | -16.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 48.09% | -34.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 57.98% | -41.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 68.18% | -49.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 66.74% | -47.85% |
SUPL vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUPL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUPL vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SUPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than SQQQ's 9.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.14% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF | 2.51% | 3.03% | 4.78% | 4.71% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUPL and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (20.82%) compared to SUPL (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPL dropped -24.42% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, SUPL leads with 8.11% vs -49.83% for SQQQ. On fees, SUPL is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SUPL has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SUPL has performed better with a 8.11% return vs -49.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUPL is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.14%, compared with 2.51% for SUPL.
SUPL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SUPL tracks FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SUPL and 0.95% for SQQQ.
SUPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUPL and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer