SUPL vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SUPL (ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUPL is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. SUPL is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUPL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

SUPL vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPL achieves a 19.48% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

SUPL

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 14.42%
• YTD: 19.48%
• 1Y: 25.17%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPL vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	19.48%	6.46%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPL and POW is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

SUPL vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPL

SUPL Risk / Return Rank: 58
SUPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SUPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SUPL Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SUPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SUPL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPL vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUPL	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	—	—

Drawdowns

SUPL vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPL drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPL and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPL	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-18.37%	-6.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-18.37%	+17.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-4.33%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SUPL	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.53%	32.94%	-16.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.93%	32.94%	-14.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	32.94%	-14.01%

SUPL vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUPL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUPL vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

SUPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	2.46%	3.03%	4.78%	4.71%	3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPL and POW in my portfolio?

SUPL and POW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SUPL or POW?

On fees, SUPL is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUPL or POW?

SUPL is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUPL or POW?

SUPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between SUPL and POW?

SUPL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SUPL and 0.75% for POW.