SULR vs. CEFS

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

SULR (SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF) and CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SULR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while CEFS is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SULR charges 0.79%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for CEFS.

Performance

SULR vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SULR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEFS

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.39%
• 6M: 14.21%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 1Y: 22.27%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 13.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SULR vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-8.35%	-12.68%	11.47%	18.72%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	13.86%	16.67%	23.48%	20.99%	-7.08%	17.86%	4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SULR and CEFS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2020	0.41

The correlation between SULR and CEFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SULR vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SULR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 85
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SULR vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SULR	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.10	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.94	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.91	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SULR	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-38.99%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.67%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.59%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.64%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SULR	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	10.64%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.22%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.33%	—

SULR vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SULR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 2.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

SULR vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

SULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	7.13%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.46%	0.28%	2.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SULR and CEFS in my portfolio?

SULR and CEFS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SULR or CEFS?

On fees, SULR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SULR or CEFS?

SULR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.61% for CEFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SULR or CEFS?

CEFS has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 0.00% for SULR.

What is the main difference between SULR and CEFS?

SULR is categorized as Actively Managed, while CEFS is Event Driven. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SULR and 2.61% for CEFS.