SULR vs. BLST
SULR (SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SULR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. SULR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.
Performance
SULR vs. BLST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SULR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLST
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SULR vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 0.46% | 2.68% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SULR vs. BLST — Risk / Return Rank
SULR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLST
SULR vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SULR | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SULR vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SULR | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.70% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.38% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility
SULR vs. BLST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SULR | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 2.27% | — |
SULR vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison
SULR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
SULR vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison
SULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 3.71% | 2.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.28% | 2.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SULR.
BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.00% for SULR.
SULR is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SULR and 0.23% for BLST.
Find the right allocation for SULR and BLST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer