SULR vs. BINT
SULR (SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF) and BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SULR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while BINT is a Global Equities fund managed by Bluemonte. SULR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BINT.
Performance
SULR vs. BINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SULR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINT
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- YTD
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SULR vs. BINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | 14.43% | 14.43% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SULR vs. BINT — Risk / Return Rank
SULR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BINT
SULR vs. BINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SULR | BINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SULR vs. BINT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SULR | BINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.06% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.53% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.72% | — |
Volatility
SULR vs. BINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SULR | BINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.89% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.69% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.69% | — |
SULR vs. BINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SULR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BINT's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
SULR vs. BINT - Dividend Comparison
SULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | 1.74% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.28% | 2.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SULR.
BINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for SULR.
SULR is categorized as Actively Managed, while BINT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SULR and 0.23% for BINT.
Find the right allocation for SULR and BINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer