SUB vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SUB (iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SUB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SUB returned 1.49%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for BNO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SUB charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

SUB vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUB achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SUB has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 1.49%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.

SUB

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 3.21%
• 3Y*: 3.19%
• 5Y*: 1.46%
• 10Y*: 1.49%

BNO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: 86.76%
• 6M: 83.45%
• 1Y: 89.50%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 23.77%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUB vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF	0.78%	3.64%	2.17%	2.91%	-2.05%	0.03%	2.51%	2.93%	1.85%	0.75%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	86.76%	-5.44%	9.67%	-3.43%	35.25%	62.34%	-38.23%	36.01%	-15.30%	15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SUB and BNO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010	-0.04

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SUB and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.28, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

SUB vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUB

SUB Risk / Return Rank: 84
SUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SUB Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SUB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUB vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUB	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.23	2.17	+1.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.68	2.68	+2.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	1.37	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	5.39	-1.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.24	10.23	+1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUB vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUB Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUB and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUB	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23	2.17	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.68	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.37	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.14	+0.29

Drawdowns

SUB vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUB drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUB and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUB	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.46%	-87.06%	+77.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.81%	-17.87%	+17.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.23%	-23.75%	+22.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.35%	-33.70%	+29.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.46%	-75.18%	+65.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-12.04%	+11.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-40.18%	+39.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	9.43%	-9.15%

Volatility

SUB vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) is 0.28%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that SUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUB	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.28%	15.03%	-14.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.79%	36.08%	-35.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00%	41.56%	-40.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.64%	35.37%	-33.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.60%	36.68%	-34.08%

SUB vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUB vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

SUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF	2.53%	2.42%	2.10%	1.73%	0.86%	0.72%	1.23%	1.58%	1.32%	0.95%	0.75%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUB and BNO in my portfolio?

SUB and BNO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUB or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to SUB (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUB dropped -9.46% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, SUB or BNO?

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.38% vs 1.49% for SUB. On fees, SUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUB or BNO?

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUB or BNO?

SUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUB or BNO?

SUB has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between SUB and BNO?

SUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. SUB tracks ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SUB and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.