PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SUB vs. SMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SUB and SMB is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

SUB vs. SMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.60%
1.61%
SUB
SMB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SUB:

2.00

SMB:

1.59

Sortino Ratio

SUB:

2.98

SMB:

2.29

Omega Ratio

SUB:

1.40

SMB:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

SUB:

3.20

SMB:

1.21

Martin Ratio

SUB:

9.62

SMB:

9.91

Ulcer Index

SUB:

0.31%

SMB:

0.32%

Daily Std Dev

SUB:

1.48%

SMB:

1.97%

Max Drawdown

SUB:

-9.46%

SMB:

-12.64%

Current Drawdown

SUB:

0.00%

SMB:

-0.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUB achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than SMB's 0.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SUB having a 1.15% annualized return and SMB not far ahead at 1.20%.


SUB

YTD

0.27%

1M

0.51%

6M

1.60%

1Y

2.84%

5Y*

1.05%

10Y*

1.15%

SMB

YTD

0.47%

1M

0.59%

6M

1.61%

1Y

3.07%

5Y*

0.81%

10Y*

1.20%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SUB vs. SMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SMB
VanEck Short Muni ETF
Expense ratio chart for SMB: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for SUB: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SUB vs. SMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SUB is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SUB is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SUB is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SUB is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SUB is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SUB is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMB is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMB is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMB is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMB is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMB is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMB is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SUB vs. SMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SUB, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.001.59
The chart of Sortino ratio for SUB, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.982.29
The chart of Omega ratio for SUB, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.401.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for SUB, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.201.21
The chart of Martin ratio for SUB, currently valued at 9.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.629.91
SUB
SMB

The current SUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUB and SMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.00
1.59
SUB
SMB

Dividends

SUB vs. SMB - Dividend Comparison

SUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than SMB's 2.37% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SUB
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
2.09%2.10%1.73%0.86%0.72%1.23%1.59%1.32%0.94%0.75%0.77%0.76%
SMB
VanEck Short Muni ETF
2.37%2.38%1.84%1.32%1.25%1.51%1.58%1.49%1.24%1.13%1.14%1.21%

Drawdowns

SUB vs. SMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUB drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum SMB drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUB and SMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-0.07%
SUB
SMB

Volatility

SUB vs. SMB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) have volatilities of 0.46% and 0.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%0.80%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.46%
0.46%
SUB
SMB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab