STZ vs. CLX
STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) and CLX (The Clorox Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — STZ in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries, CLX in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, STZ returned 0.71%/yr vs -0.30%/yr for CLX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STZ vs. CLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than CLX's -3.38% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has outperformed CLX with an annualized return of 0.71%, while CLX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.30% annualized return.
STZ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- -15.85%
- 3Y*
- -14.74%
- 5Y*
- -8.24%
- 10Y*
- 0.71%
CLX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- -3.38%
- 6M
- -3.47%
- 1Y
- -22.12%
- 3Y*
- -12.13%
- 5Y*
- -8.48%
- 10Y*
- -0.30%
STZ vs. CLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 3.44% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 16.12% | 17.41% | 19.85% | -28.73% | 50.69% |
CLX The Clorox Company | -3.38% | -35.59% | 17.72% | 4.99% | -17.00% | -11.50% | 34.46% | 2.23% | 6.55% | 27.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between STZ and CLX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 1992 | 0.23 |
The correlation between STZ and CLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (10 years) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STZ:
$24.46B
CLX:
$11.59B
STZ:
$11.23
CLX:
$6.17
STZ:
12.54
CLX:
15.43
STZ:
7.81
CLX:
0.35
STZ:
2.69
CLX:
1.73
STZ:
$9.14B
CLX:
$6.76B
STZ:
$4.71B
CLX:
$2.96B
STZ:
$3.05B
CLX:
$1.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STZ vs. CLX — Risk / Return Rank
STZ
CLX
STZ vs. CLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Clorox Company (CLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STZ | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.88 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.70 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | -1.45 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STZ | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | -0.80 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | -0.33 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | -0.01 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
STZ vs. CLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -67.39%, which is greater than CLX's maximum drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and CLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STZ | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.39% | -56.34% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -31.52% | +5.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.28% | -46.11% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.28% | -46.11% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.53% | -56.34% | +2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.54% | -51.76% | +6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -13.42% | -3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.89% | 15.25% | -0.36% |
Volatility
STZ vs. CLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) is 8.70%, while The Clorox Company (CLX) has a volatility of 10.85%. This indicates that STZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STZ | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 10.85% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.49% | 23.46% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.97% | 27.93% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 26.04% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 24.49% | +2.45% |
Dividends
STZ vs. CLX - Dividend Comparison
STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than CLX's 5.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLX The Clorox Company | 5.21% | 4.88% | 2.98% | 3.34% | 3.33% | 2.60% | 2.15% | 2.63% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 2.62% | 2.38% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.90% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
Financials
STZ vs. CLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and The Clorox Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STZ vs. CLX - Profitability Comparison
STZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 941.60M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
CLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported a gross profit of 722.00M and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.2%.
STZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 357.10M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
CLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported an operating income of 466.00M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.9%.
STZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 477.70M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
CLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported a net income of 187.00M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STZ and CLX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLX has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to STZ (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STZ dropped -67.39% vs CLX's -56.34%.
STZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STZ and CLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer