STZ vs. 4GLD.DE
STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) is a stock, while 4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Over the past 10 years, STZ returned 1.01%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for 4GLD.DE. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STZ vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STZ is traded in USD, while 4GLD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 4GLD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's -4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has underperformed 4GLD.DE with an annualized return of 1.01%, while 4GLD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.
STZ
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- -13.90%
- 5Y*
- -7.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.01%
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- 1Y
- 24.35%
- 3Y*
- 29.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
STZ vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 9.07% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 16.12% | 17.41% | 19.85% | -28.73% | 50.69% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | -4.13% | 68.58% | 26.88% | 12.78% | 0.68% | -3.06% | 23.04% | 18.91% | -1.62% | 12.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between STZ and 4GLD.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2009 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STZ vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
STZ
4GLD.DE
STZ vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STZ | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.19 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.08 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 3.28 | -3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STZ vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -67.39%, which is greater than 4GLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -44.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and 4GLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STZ | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.39% | -44.26% | -23.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -22.52% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.28% | -22.52% | -28.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.28% | -22.52% | -28.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.53% | -22.52% | -31.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.57% | -20.33% | -22.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -17.59% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.01% | 7.40% | +7.61% |
Volatility
STZ vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 7.56%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STZ | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 7.56% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.36% | 21.74% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.17% | 24.91% | +5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 17.59% | +6.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.96% | 15.77% | +11.19% |
Dividends
STZ vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while 4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.75% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STZ and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for STZ and 4GLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer