STXV vs. MFVL
STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. STXV is passively managed, while MFVL is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
STXV vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.
STXV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STXV vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 12.50% | 1.76% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXV and MFVL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXV vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
STXV
MFVL
STXV vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.31 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
STXV vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -7.03% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -3.29% | +3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -2.42% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | — | — |
Volatility
STXV vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 12.15% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 12.15% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 12.15% | +1.07% |
STXV vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXV vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 2.24% | 2.37% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXV and MFVL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
STXV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Strive and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for STXV and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer