STXV vs. CDC
STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - STXV tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Value while CDC tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXV returned 18.06%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for CDC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for CDC.
Performance
STXV vs. CDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than CDC's 10.57% return.
STXV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 18.16%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
STXV vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 12.50% | 16.26% | 13.34% | 9.28% | -1.46% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 10.57% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXV and CDC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between STXV and CDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXV vs. CDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXV
CDC
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
STXV
CDC
Healthcare
STXV
CDC
Technology
STXV
CDC
Energy
STXV
CDC
Consumer Defensive
STXV
CDC
Industrials
STXV
CDC
Utilities
STXV
CDC
Consumer Cyclical
STXV
CDC
Communication Services
STXV
CDC
Real Estate
STXV
CDC
Basic Materials
STXV
CDC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXV vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank
STXV
CDC
STXV vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXV | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.32 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 3.22 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 11.37 | +5.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXV | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 1.87 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.74 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
STXV vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum CDC drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and CDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXV | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -21.37% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -5.67% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -12.70% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -2.20% | +2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -5.09% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.60% | -0.01% |
Volatility
STXV vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) is 2.03%, while VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that STXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXV | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 2.66% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 6.84% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 9.77% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 12.54% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 13.21% | +0.01% |
STXV vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXV vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison
STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than CDC's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.18% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 2.24% | 2.37% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXV and CDC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDC has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to STXV (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs CDC's -21.37%.
On 3-year performance, STXV leads with 18.06% vs 11.97% for CDC. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXV has performed better with a 18.06% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.
CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.24% for STXV.
STXV tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.37% for CDC.
STXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXV and CDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer