STXT vs. MBS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

STXT (Strive Total Return Bond ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. STXT is passively managed, while MBS is actively managed. Over the past year, STXT returned 4.34% vs 7.19% for MBS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

STXT vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXT achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.91% return.

STXT

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 4.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MBS

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: 7.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXT vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
STXT Strive Total Return Bond ETF	0.19%	6.58%	3.56%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.91%	8.13%	5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between STXT and MBS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024	0.63

The correlation between STXT and MBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

STXT vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXT

STXT Risk / Return Rank: 30
STXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
STXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
STXT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
STXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
STXT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 71
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXT vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STXT	MBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	2.48	-1.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	3.73	-2.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.48	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	3.12	-1.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	9.95	-5.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STXT vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXT and MBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STXT	MBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	2.48	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	1.64	-0.74

Drawdowns

STXT vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXT drawdown since its inception was -5.27%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXT and MBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXT	MBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-4.09%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-2.20%	-0.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-1.18%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-1.02%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.69%	+0.23%

Volatility

STXT vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 0.87%. This indicates that STXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXT	MBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	0.87%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	2.00%	+0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87%	2.93%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.04%	3.99%	+1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.04%	3.99%	+1.05%

STXT vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both STXT and MBS have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

STXT vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

STXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than MBS's 5.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.60%	5.28%	4.52%	0.00%
STXT Strive Total Return Bond ETF	4.70%	4.93%	5.15%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXT and MBS in my portfolio?

STXT and MBS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXT or MBS?

STXT has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to MBS (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXT dropped -5.27% vs MBS's -4.09%.

Which ETF is better, STXT or MBS?

On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 7.19% vs 4.34% for STXT. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, MBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXT or MBS?

Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 7.19% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXT or MBS?

STXT and MBS have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXT or MBS?

MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 4.70% for STXT.

What is the main difference between STXT and MBS?

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Angel Oak.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.