STXT vs. DBND

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

STXT (Strive Total Return Bond ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, from Strive and DoubleLine respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STXT returned 0.25% vs 1.72% for DBND. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. STXT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.

Performance

STXT vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXT achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than DBND's -0.89% return.

STXT

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.94%
• 6M: -1.62%
• YTD: -1.36%
• 1Y: 0.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.75%

DBND

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: -1.26%
• YTD: -0.89%
• 1Y: 1.72%
• 3Y*: 4.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	$3.03M	$2.95M	$3.32M
STXT Strive Total Return Bond ETF	$196.64K	$234.99K	$375.50K

STXT vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
STXT Strive Total Return Bond ETF	-1.36%	6.58%	1.77%	4.30%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.89%	7.41%	3.06%	3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between STXT and DBND is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023	0.82

The correlation between STXT and DBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

STXT vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STXT

STXT Risk / Return Rank: 16
STXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
STXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
STXT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
STXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
STXT Martin Ratio Rank: 16

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 29
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STXT vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STXT	DBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	0.79	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	1.15	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.14	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	0.90	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.79	2.14	-1.36

STXT vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXT and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STXT vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXT drawdown since its inception was -5.27%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXT and DBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXT	DBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-9.39%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-2.83%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-2.46%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.43%	-2.25%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.40%	1.19%	+0.21%

Volatility

STXT vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 0.90%. This indicates that STXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXT	DBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	0.90%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	2.59%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93%	3.24%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.01%	5.04%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.01%	5.04%	-0.03%

STXT vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXT vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

STXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than DBND's 4.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.41%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%
STXT Strive Total Return Bond ETF	4.76%	4.93%	5.15%	1.82%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXT and DBND in my portfolio?

STXT and DBND have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXT or DBND?

STXT has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to DBND (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXT dropped -5.27% vs DBND's -9.39%.

Which ETF is better, STXT or DBND?

On 1-year performance, DBND leads with 1.72% vs 0.25% for STXT. On fees, STXT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXT or DBND?

Over the 1-year period, DBND has performed better with a 1.72% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXT or DBND?

STXT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXT or DBND?

STXT has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.41% for DBND.

What is the main difference between STXT and DBND?

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for STXT and 0.50% for DBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.