PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXK vs. SMCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXK vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


STXK

1D
-0.89%
1M
2.04%
YTD
10.46%
6M
9.14%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
10Y*

SMCP

1D
-0.30%
1M
-25.99%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXK vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between STXK and SMCP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026

0.24

STXK vs. SMCP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STXK
SMCP

Technology

16.4%
11.1%

Financial Services

15.8%
98.8%

Industrials

14.6%
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
7.3%

Healthcare

12.2%
11.0%

Real Estate

7.4%
3.1%

Energy

7.0%
7.6%

Basic Materials

4.5%
7.9%

Utilities

3.2%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
8.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
4.0%

Technology

STXK
16.4%
SMCP
11.1%

Financial Services

STXK
15.8%
SMCP
98.8%

Industrials

STXK
14.6%
SMCP
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

STXK
13.5%
SMCP
7.3%

Healthcare

STXK
12.2%
SMCP
11.0%

Real Estate

STXK
7.4%
SMCP
3.1%

Energy

STXK
7.0%
SMCP
7.6%

Basic Materials

STXK
4.5%
SMCP
7.9%

Utilities

STXK
3.2%
SMCP
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

STXK
3.1%
SMCP
8.1%

Communication Services

STXK
2.2%
SMCP
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXK vs. SMCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXK
STXK Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
STXK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
STXK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXK vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXKSMCPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.12

STXK vs. SMCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXKSMCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

-1.43

+2.03

Drawdowns

STXK vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, roughly equal to the maximum SMCP drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and SMCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXKSMCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.12%

-27.86%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-25.99%

+24.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-5.33%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

Volatility

STXK vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXKSMCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

43.62%

-26.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

43.62%

-23.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

43.62%

-23.50%

STXK vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXK vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison

STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SMCP
AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STXK
Strive Small-Cap ETF
1.39%1.29%1.64%1.14%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


STXK and SMCP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.

STXK has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.

STXK tracks Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SMCP tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Strive and AlphaMark Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.90% for SMCP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXK and SMCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer