PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXK vs. RUSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXK vs. RUSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than RUSC's 18.04% return.


STXK

1D
-0.89%
1M
2.04%
YTD
10.46%
6M
9.14%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
10Y*

RUSC

1D
-0.75%
1M
2.94%
YTD
18.04%
6M
17.30%
1Y
38.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXK vs. RUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
STXK
Strive Small-Cap ETF
10.46%13.89%
RUSC
U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF
18.04%17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between STXK and RUSC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025

0.94

The correlation between STXK and RUSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXK vs. RUSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXK
STXK Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
STXK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
STXK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

RUSC
RUSC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXK vs. RUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXKRUSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

2.12

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

3.01

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

4.18

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.12

14.94

-5.82

STXK vs. RUSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXK Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the RUSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXK and RUSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXKRUSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.12

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

2.03

-1.44

Drawdowns

STXK vs. RUSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, which is greater than RUSC's maximum drawdown of -9.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and RUSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXKRUSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.12%

-9.18%

-17.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-9.18%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-1.27%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-1.75%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.57%

+0.27%

Volatility

STXK vs. RUSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) is 4.21%, while U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that STXK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXKRUSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

5.36%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

12.99%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

18.14%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

18.09%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

18.09%

+2.03%

STXK vs. RUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RUSC's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXK vs. RUSC - Dividend Comparison

STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than RUSC's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
RUSC
U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF
0.32%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STXK
Strive Small-Cap ETF
1.39%1.29%1.64%1.14%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, STXK and RUSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RUSC has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to STXK (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs RUSC's -9.18%.

On 1-year performance, RUSC leads with 38.22% vs 25.86% for STXK. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RUSC has performed better with a 38.22% return vs 25.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for RUSC.

STXK has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.32% for RUSC.

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.64% for RUSC.

RUSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXK and RUSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer