RUSC vs. FSCC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RUSC (U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF) and FSCC (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RUSC returned 43.83% vs 44.27% for FSCC. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RUSC charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FSCC.

Performance

RUSC vs. FSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUSC achieves a 23.06% return, which is significantly higher than FSCC's 20.60% return.

RUSC

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.41%
• YTD: 23.06%
• 6M: 20.35%
• 1Y: 43.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSCC

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 17.48%
• 1Y: 44.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RUSC vs. FSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RUSC U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF	23.06%	16.87%
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF	20.60%	19.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RUSC and FSCC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.96

The correlation between RUSC and FSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RUSC vs. FSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUSC

RUSC Risk / Return Rank: 79
RUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FSCC

FSCC Risk / Return Rank: 74
FSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUSC vs. FSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RUSC	FSCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.27	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.11	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.80	4.02	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.10	14.68	+2.41

RUSC vs. FSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FSCC Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUSC and FSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RUSC vs. FSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUSC drawdown since its inception was -9.18%, smaller than the maximum FSCC drawdown of -27.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSC and FSCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RUSC	FSCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.18%	-27.17%	+17.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-11.07%	+1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.71%	-5.08%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	3.02%	-0.45%

Volatility

RUSC vs. FSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC) is 5.84%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that RUSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RUSC	FSCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.84%	6.18%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.63%	14.11%	-0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.60%	19.61%	-1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.34%	22.36%	-4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.34%	22.36%	-4.02%

RUSC vs. FSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RUSC has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCC's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

RUSC vs. FSCC - Dividend Comparison

RUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than FSCC's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.16%
RUSC U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF	0.31%	0.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RUSC and FSCC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, RUSC and FSCC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RUSC or FSCC?

FSCC has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to RUSC (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUSC dropped -9.18% vs FSCC's -27.17%.

Which ETF is better, RUSC or FSCC?

On 1-year performance, FSCC leads with 44.27% vs 43.83% for RUSC. On fees, FSCC is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RUSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RUSC or FSCC?

Over the 1-year period, FSCC has performed better with a 44.27% return vs 43.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RUSC or FSCC?

FSCC is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for RUSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RUSC or FSCC?

RUSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.22% for FSCC.

What is the main difference between RUSC and FSCC?

They also come from different issuers: Russell and Federated Hermes. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for RUSC and 0.36% for FSCC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RUSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.