STXK vs. COMT
STXK (Strive Small-Cap ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 600 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. STXK is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXK returned 14.24%/yr vs 16.86%/yr for COMT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STXK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
STXK vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
STXK
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
STXK vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 10.46% | 7.82% | 9.47% | 20.15% | -4.99% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | -3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXK and COMT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.11 |
The correlation between STXK and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
STXK vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXK
COMT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
STXK
COMT
-
Financial Services
STXK
COMT
Industrials
STXK
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
STXK
COMT
-
Healthcare
STXK
COMT
-
Real Estate
STXK
COMT
-
Energy
STXK
COMT
-
Basic Materials
STXK
COMT
-
Utilities
STXK
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
STXK
COMT
-
Communication Services
STXK
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXK vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
STXK
COMT
STXK vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXK | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 5.95 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 14.11 | -4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXK | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.24 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.20 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
STXK vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXK | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.12% | -51.89% | +24.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -8.02% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.12% | -13.31% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -4.82% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -24.07% | +18.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.38% | -0.54% |
Volatility
STXK vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) is 4.21%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that STXK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXK | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 7.37% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 18.80% | -7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 21.29% | -4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 21.06% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 18.89% | +1.23% |
STXK vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXK vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
STXK Strive Small-Cap ETF | 1.39% | 1.29% | 1.64% | 1.14% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXK and COMT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to STXK (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 16.86% vs 14.24% for STXK. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXK has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 14.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.39% for STXK.
STXK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Strive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXK and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer