PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXK vs. COMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXK vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXK achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 17.53% return.


STXK

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.96%
6M
9.99%
YTD
15.86%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
10Y*

COMB

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.59%
6M
14.82%
YTD
17.53%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXK vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STXK
Strive Small-Cap ETF
15.86%7.82%9.47%20.15%-3.32%
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
17.53%15.12%5.24%-7.75%-1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between STXK and COMB is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.17

The correlation between STXK and COMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXK vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXK
STXK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
STXK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
STXK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXK Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

COMB
COMB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXK vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXKCOMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.82

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

6.14

+2.05

STXK vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXK Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXK and COMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STXK vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXK drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXK and COMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXKCOMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.12%

-33.50%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-14.84%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.12%

-14.84%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-11.35%

+10.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-12.05%

+6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

4.40%

-1.57%

Volatility

STXK vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

Strive Small-Cap ETF (STXK) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) have volatilities of 4.25% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXKCOMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

4.24%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

15.09%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

17.38%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

16.69%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

15.15%

+4.87%

STXK vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STXK vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

STXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than COMB's 7.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
7.70%9.05%2.48%6.57%30.85%15.83%0.07%1.48%0.97%0.20%
STXK
Strive Small-Cap ETF
1.14%1.29%1.64%1.14%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STXK and COMB have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STXK has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to COMB (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXK dropped -27.12% vs COMB's -33.50%.

On 3-year performance, STXK leads with 14.12% vs 11.95% for COMB. On fees, STXK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXK has performed better with a 14.12% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for COMB.

COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 1.14% for STXK.

STXK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Strive and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXK and 0.25% for COMB.

COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXK and COMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer