PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXG vs. STXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXG vs. STXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Strive 500 ETF (STXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than STXF's 8.09% return.


STXG

1D
-1.77%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
6.35%
6M
5.23%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
10Y*

STXF

1D
-1.57%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
8.09%
6M
7.10%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXG vs. STXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STXG
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
6.35%17.82%28.53%35.95%-1.65%
STXF
Strive 500 ETF
8.09%17.95%25.13%27.70%2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between STXG and STXF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.95

The correlation between STXG and STXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXG vs. STXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXG
STXG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
STXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
STXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

STXF
STXF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
STXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
STXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXG vs. STXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Strive 500 ETF (STXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXGSTXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.57

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

11.21

-4.18

STXG vs. STXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the STXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXG and STXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STXG vs. STXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, which is greater than STXF's maximum drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and STXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXGSTXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-19.00%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-9.29%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.22%

-19.00%

-2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-3.26%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-2.30%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.12%

+1.08%

Volatility

STXG vs. STXF - Volatility Comparison

Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Strive 500 ETF (STXF) at 5.02%. This indicates that STXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXGSTXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

5.02%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

10.30%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

13.09%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.67%

16.17%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

16.17%

+1.50%

STXG vs. STXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than STXF's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STXG vs. STXF - Dividend Comparison

STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than STXF's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
STXF
Strive 500 ETF
1.05%1.05%1.13%1.21%0.37%
STXG
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
0.47%0.48%0.51%0.55%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, STXG and STXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXG has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to STXF (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs STXF's -19.00%.

On 3-year performance, STXG leads with 21.55% vs 21.03% for STXF. On fees, STXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, STXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXG has performed better with a 21.55% return vs 21.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXG.

STXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.47% for STXG.

STXG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while STXF is Large Cap Blend Equities. STXG tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while STXF tracks Bloomberg US Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.05% for STXF.

STXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXG and STXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer