PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXF vs. STXV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXF vs. STXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 500 ETF (STXF) and Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXF achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than STXV's 14.89% return.


STXF

1D
0.50%
1M
0.11%
YTD
8.95%
6M
9.14%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
10Y*

STXV

1D
0.97%
1M
4.37%
YTD
14.89%
6M
14.74%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXF vs. STXV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STXF
Strive 500 ETF
8.95%17.95%25.13%27.70%2.49%
STXV
Strive 1000 Value ETF
14.89%16.26%13.34%9.28%-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between STXF and STXV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.67

The correlation between STXF and STXV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXF vs. STXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXF
STXF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
STXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
STXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

STXV
STXV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
STXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
STXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXF vs. STXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 500 ETF (STXF) and Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXFSTXVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.50

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

4.87

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

17.75

-6.31

STXF vs. STXV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the STXV Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXF and STXV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STXF vs. STXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXF drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, which is greater than STXV's maximum drawdown of -14.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXF and STXV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXFSTXVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-14.80%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-5.81%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-14.80%

-4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

0.00%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-2.73%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.59%

+0.52%

Volatility

STXF vs. STXV - Volatility Comparison

Strive 500 ETF (STXF) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) at 2.46%. This indicates that STXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STXV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXFSTXVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

2.46%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

7.05%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

10.14%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

13.22%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.15%

13.22%

+2.93%

STXF vs. STXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than STXV's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STXF vs. STXV - Dividend Comparison

STXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than STXV's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
STXF
Strive 500 ETF
1.04%1.05%1.13%1.21%0.37%
STXV
Strive 1000 Value ETF
2.19%2.37%2.36%2.05%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


STXF and STXV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STXF has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to STXV (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXF dropped -19.00% vs STXV's -14.80%.

On 3-year performance, STXF leads with 21.18% vs 17.90% for STXV. On fees, STXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXF has performed better with a 21.18% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXV.

STXV has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.04% for STXF.

STXF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while STXV is Large Cap Value Equities. STXF tracks Bloomberg US Large Cap Index, while STXV tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Value. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for STXF and 0.18% for STXV.

STXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXF and STXV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer