STXG vs. QCLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STXG (Strive 1000 Growth ETF) and QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXG returned 23.77%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for QCLR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLR.

Performance

STXG vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's 1.40% return.

STXG

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 5.96%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 6M: 9.84%
• 1Y: 27.66%
• 3Y*: 23.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCLR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 11.39%
• 3Y*: 13.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXG vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF	10.21%	17.82%	28.53%	35.95%	-3.74%
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	1.40%	11.27%	20.27%	28.87%	-6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between STXG and QCLR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022	0.89

The correlation between STXG and QCLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXG vs. QCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXG	QCLR
Technology	45.0%	53.8%
Communication Services	12.6%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	12.2%
Industrials	9.3%	2.9%
Financial Services	7.6%	0.2%
Healthcare	6.0%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	7.7%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.1%
Utilities	0.7%	1.4%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%

Return for Risk

STXG vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXG

STXG Risk / Return Rank: 53
STXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
STXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
STXG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
STXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
STXG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

QCLR

QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 29
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXG vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STXG	QCLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.17	+0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.60	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.22	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	1.12	+1.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.91	4.02	+4.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STXG vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXG and QCLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STXG	QCLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	1.17	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	0.67	+0.74

Drawdowns

STXG vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, roughly equal to the maximum QCLR drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and QCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXG	QCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.22%	-21.77%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.62%	-10.22%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.22%	-13.58%	-7.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-0.89%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-6.20%	+3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.84%	+0.27%

Volatility

STXG vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 0.45%. This indicates that STXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXG	QCLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	0.45%	+3.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.06%	7.24%	+3.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.44%	9.82%	+4.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	12.42%	+5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	12.42%	+5.11%

STXG vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXG vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than QCLR's 14.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	14.68%	14.89%	8.89%	0.47%	0.27%	1.64%
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF	0.46%	0.48%	0.51%	0.55%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXG and QCLR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, STXG and QCLR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, STXG or QCLR?

STXG has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to QCLR (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs QCLR's -21.77%.

Which ETF is better, STXG or QCLR?

On 3-year performance, STXG leads with 23.77% vs 13.84% for QCLR. On fees, STXG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXG or QCLR?

Over the 3-year period, STXG has performed better with a 23.77% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXG or QCLR?

STXG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXG or QCLR?

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.46% for STXG.

What is the main difference between STXG and QCLR?

STXG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. STXG tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.60% for QCLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.