STXG vs. ITOT
STXG (Strive 1000 Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - STXG tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth while ITOT tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXG returned 24.12%/yr vs 22.39%/yr for ITOT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. STXG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
STXG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 12.07% return.
STXG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 29.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 29.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
STXG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF | 11.15% | 17.82% | 28.53% | 35.95% | -3.74% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 12.07% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -2.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXG and ITOT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between STXG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXG
ITOT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
STXG
ITOT
Communication Services
STXG
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
STXG
ITOT
Industrials
STXG
ITOT
Financial Services
STXG
ITOT
Healthcare
STXG
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
STXG
ITOT
Real Estate
STXG
ITOT
Basic Materials
STXG
ITOT
Utilities
STXG
ITOT
Energy
STXG
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
STXG
ITOT
STXG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 2.47 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 3.36 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.45 | -1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 15.85 | -6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.47 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.57 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
STXG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -55.20% | +33.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -8.90% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.22% | -19.44% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -6.97% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 1.93% | +1.18% |
Volatility
STXG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.89%. This indicates that STXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.89% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 9.11% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 12.18% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 17.36% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 18.27% | -0.74% |
STXG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STXG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than ITOT's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.48% | 0.51% | 0.55% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, STXG and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXG has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to ITOT (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 3-year performance, STXG leads with 24.12% vs 22.39% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXG has performed better with a 24.12% return vs 22.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXG.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.45% for STXG.
STXG tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while ITOT tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXG and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer