STXG vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

STXG (Strive 1000 Growth ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STXG returned 29.72% vs 4.48% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. STXG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

STXG vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.35% return.

STXG

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 10.91%
• 1Y: 29.72%
• 3Y*: 24.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXG vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF	11.15%	17.82%	28.53%	9.13%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.35%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between STXG and IBIC is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	-0.07

The correlation between STXG and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

STXG vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXG

STXG Risk / Return Rank: 56
STXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
STXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
STXG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
STXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
STXG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXG vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STXG	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	4.97	-2.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	8.97	-6.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	2.21	-0.85
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	17.05	-14.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.70	66.57	-56.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STXG vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXG and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STXG	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	4.97	-2.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	3.49	-2.06

Drawdowns

STXG vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXG	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.22%	-0.90%	-20.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.62%	-0.26%	-12.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.15%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-0.10%	-2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	0.07%	+3.04%

Volatility

STXG vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.34%. This indicates that STXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXG	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	0.34%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	0.67%	+10.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.41%	0.90%	+13.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	1.58%	+15.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	1.58%	+15.95%

STXG vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

STXG vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%	0.00%
STXG Strive 1000 Growth ETF	0.45%	0.48%	0.51%	0.55%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXG and IBIC in my portfolio?

STXG and IBIC have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXG or IBIC?

STXG has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to IBIC (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, STXG or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, STXG leads with 29.72% vs 4.48% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXG or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, STXG has performed better with a 29.72% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXG or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXG or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.45% for STXG.

What is the main difference between STXG and IBIC?

STXG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. STXG tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Growth, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.