PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXG vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXG vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXG achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 33.68% return.


STXG

1D
0.10%
1M
6.55%
YTD
11.15%
6M
10.91%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
10Y*

DARP

1D
1.48%
1M
9.77%
YTD
33.68%
6M
35.64%
1Y
86.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXG vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
STXG
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
11.15%17.82%28.53%9.60%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
33.68%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between STXG and DARP is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023

0.84

The correlation between STXG and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXG vs. DARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STXG
DARP

Technology

45.0%
45.8%

Communication Services

12.6%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
6.6%

Industrials

9.3%
12.0%

Financial Services

7.6%

-

Healthcare

6.0%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%
4.7%

Utilities

0.7%
5.4%

Energy

0.6%
9.9%

Technology

STXG
45.0%
DARP
45.8%

Communication Services

STXG
12.6%
DARP
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

STXG
11.4%
DARP
6.6%

Industrials

STXG
9.3%
DARP
12.0%

Financial Services

STXG
7.6%
DARP

-

Healthcare

STXG
6.0%
DARP
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

STXG
3.4%
DARP

-

Real Estate

STXG
1.7%
DARP

-

Basic Materials

STXG
1.5%
DARP
4.7%

Utilities

STXG
0.7%
DARP
5.4%

Energy

STXG
0.6%
DARP
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXG vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXG
STXG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
STXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
STXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXG vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXGDARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

3.77

-1.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

4.18

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.57

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

7.54

-5.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.70

28.74

-19.04

STXG vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXG and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXGDARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

3.77

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

1.50

-0.07

Drawdowns

STXG vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXG drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXG and DARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXGDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-30.27%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-11.82%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-4.65%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.10%

+0.01%

Volatility

STXG vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) is 3.49%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that STXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXGDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

6.97%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

17.47%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.41%

23.16%

-8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

26.12%

-8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.53%

26.12%

-8.59%

STXG vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXG vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

STXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than DARP's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.32%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%
STXG
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
0.45%0.48%0.51%0.55%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


STXG and DARP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DARP has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to STXG (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXG dropped -21.22% vs DARP's -30.27%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 86.66% vs 29.72% for STXG. On fees, STXG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 86.66% return vs 29.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

STXG has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.32% for DARP.

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXG and 0.75% for DARP.

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXG and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer