STXE vs. EMKT
STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. STXE is passively managed, while EMKT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. STXE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for EMKT.
Performance
STXE vs. EMKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than EMKT's 21.81% return.
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
EMKT
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- YTD
- 21.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $345.57K | $374.37K | $613.40K | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
STXE vs. EMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 3.13% |
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 21.81% | -1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXE and EMKT is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXE vs. EMKT — Risk / Return Rank
STXE
EMKT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STXE vs. EMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STXE | EMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STXE vs. EMKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, which is greater than EMKT's maximum drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and EMKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXE | EMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -14.21% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -8.32% | -6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -3.70% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | — | — |
Volatility
STXE vs. EMKT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXE | EMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.83% | 25.81% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 25.81% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 25.81% | -5.64% |
STXE vs. EMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EMKT's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXE vs. EMKT - Dividend Comparison
STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than EMKT's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, STXE and EMKT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EMKT.
STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.46% for EMKT.
They also come from different issuers: Strive and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for STXE and 0.74% for EMKT.
Find the right allocation for STXE and EMKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer