STXE vs. ECOW
STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross while ECOW tracks the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXE returned 23.32%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for ECOW. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. STXE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.
Performance
STXE vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than ECOW's 13.04% return.
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
ECOW
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 29.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $617.95K | $706.50K | $1.39M | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
STXE vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 12.38% |
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.04% | 32.50% | 3.17% | 9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXE and ECOW is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between STXE and ECOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXE vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXE
ECOW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
STXE
ECOW
Financial Services
STXE
ECOW
-
Basic Materials
STXE
ECOW
Industrials
STXE
ECOW
Energy
STXE
ECOW
Communication Services
STXE
ECOW
Consumer Defensive
STXE
ECOW
Consumer Cyclical
STXE
ECOW
Utilities
STXE
ECOW
Healthcare
STXE
ECOW
Real Estate
STXE
ECOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXE vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank
STXE
ECOW
STXE vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STXE | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 3.56 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 9.38 | +0.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STXE vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, smaller than the maximum ECOW drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and ECOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXE | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -40.27% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -8.35% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.38% | -18.77% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -3.58% | -11.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -10.94% | +6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 3.16% | +2.23% |
Volatility
STXE vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) at 3.51%. This indicates that STXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXE | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 3.51% | +9.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | 11.99% | +16.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.83% | 14.81% | +15.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 17.73% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 20.04% | +0.13% |
STXE vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXE vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison
STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than ECOW's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.44% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXE and ECOW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to ECOW (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXE dropped -20.38% vs ECOW's -40.27%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 16.24% for ECOW. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ECOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 16.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.
ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 1.91% for STXE.
STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for STXE and 0.70% for ECOW.
ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXE and ECOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer