STXE vs. CAOS
STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. STXE is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXE returned 23.32%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for CAOS. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. STXE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
STXE vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXE achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.81M | $5.39M | $5.09M | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
STXE vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 13.65% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.76% | 2.55% | 5.33% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXE and CAOS is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between STXE and CAOS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.28, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXE vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
STXE
CAOS
STXE vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STXE | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.47 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 5.45 | +4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STXE vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXE drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXE and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXE | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -3.89% | -16.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -0.76% | -19.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.38% | -3.60% | -16.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -1.13% | -13.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -0.92% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 0.34% | +5.05% |
Volatility
STXE vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.51%. This indicates that STXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXE | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 0.51% | +12.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | 1.07% | +27.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.83% | 1.57% | +28.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 4.18% | +15.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 4.18% | +15.99% |
STXE vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXE vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXE and CAOS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to CAOS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXE dropped -20.38% vs CAOS's -3.89%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 3.48% for CAOS. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
STXE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for STXE and 0.63% for CAOS.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXE and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer