STXD vs. MTUM
STXD (Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXD returned 15.13%/yr vs 34.28%/yr for MTUM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STXD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
STXD vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXD achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.37% return.
STXD
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 17.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 14.36%
- YTD
- 30.37%
- 6M
- 31.51%
- 1Y
- 40.75%
- 3Y*
- 34.28%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
STXD vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXD Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF | 5.65% | 14.79% | 14.51% | 13.94% | -0.18% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 30.37% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXD and MTUM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between STXD and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXD vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXD
MTUM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
STXD
MTUM
Financial Services
STXD
MTUM
Industrials
STXD
MTUM
Healthcare
STXD
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
STXD
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
STXD
MTUM
Real Estate
STXD
MTUM
Basic Materials
STXD
MTUM
Utilities
STXD
MTUM
Energy
STXD
MTUM
Communication Services
STXD
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXD vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
STXD
MTUM
STXD vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXD | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 2.15 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 2.92 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 3.63 | -1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 14.50 | -6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXD | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.15 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.84 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
STXD vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXD drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXD and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXD | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -34.08% | +19.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -11.54% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.87% | -20.99% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -6.21% | +4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.89% | -0.66% |
Volatility
STXD vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF (STXD) is 2.95%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that STXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXD | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 7.73% | -4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 16.49% | -7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 19.03% | -7.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 20.59% | -7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 21.04% | -7.92% |
STXD vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXD vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
STXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
STXD Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF | 1.20% | 1.15% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXD and MTUM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to STXD (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXD dropped -14.87% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 34.28% vs 15.13% for STXD. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, STXD has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 34.28% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for STXD.
STXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
STXD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. STXD tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for STXD and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXD and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer