STX vs. UL
STX (Seagate Technology plc) and UL (Unilever PLC) are both stocks. STX operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, STX returned 44.07%/yr vs 5.17%/yr for UL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STX vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STX achieves a 192.10% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -3.56% return. Over the past 10 years, STX has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 44.07%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.
STX
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -24.97%
- 6M
- 146.58%
- YTD
- 192.10%
- 1Y
- 442.73%
- 3Y*
- 143.47%
- 5Y*
- 62.35%
- 10Y*
- 44.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.72%
UL
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- 6M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -3.56%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.38%
STX vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STX Seagate Technology plc | 192.10% | 225.26% | 4.06% | 69.12% | -51.42% | 87.50% | 10.14% | 62.14% | -2.90% | 16.67% |
UL Unilever PLC | -3.56% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between STX and UL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2002 | 0.22 |
The correlation between STX and UL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STX:
$179.93B
UL:
$133.56B
STX:
$10.48
UL:
€5.38
STX:
76.60
UL:
10.07
STX:
0.92
UL:
1.97
STX:
16.54
UL:
1.09
STX:
167.09
UL:
7.67
STX:
$11.01B
UL:
€109.27B
STX:
$4.57B
UL:
€90.89B
STX:
$2.59B
UL:
€24.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STX vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
STX
UL
STX vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seagate Technology plc (STX) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STX | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 0.98 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.03 | -0.18 | +14.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.15 | -0.35 | +49.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STX vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STX drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STX and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STX | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.74% | -53.55% | -35.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.81% | -25.09% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.00% | -25.09% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.99% | -25.09% | -31.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.99% | -30.13% | -26.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.60% | -15.44% | -11.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.39% | -10.62% | -15.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 13.20% | -4.14% |
Volatility
STX vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
Seagate Technology plc (STX) has a higher volatility of 27.07% compared to Unilever PLC (UL) at 6.50%. This indicates that STX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STX | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.07% | 6.50% | +20.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.95% | 17.27% | +36.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.03% | 22.22% | +47.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.44% | 21.04% | +25.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.33% | 21.52% | +20.81% |
Dividends
STX vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
STX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than UL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STX Seagate Technology plc | 0.37% | 1.05% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 5.32% | 2.40% | 4.21% | 4.27% | 6.53% | 6.02% | 6.60% | 6.14% |
UL Unilever PLC | 3.68% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
STX vs. UL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seagate Technology plc and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STX vs. UL - Profitability Comparison
STX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 3.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
STX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported an operating income of 982.00M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
STX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported a net income of 748.00M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STX and UL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STX has higher volatility (27.07%) compared to UL (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STX dropped -88.74% vs UL's -53.55%.
STX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.39 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STX and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer