PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STX vs. HYMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STX vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seagate Technology plc (STX) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STX achieves a 238.67% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 8.37% return.


STX

1D
7.25%
1M
15.69%
YTD
238.67%
6M
225.10%
1Y
640.98%
3Y*
149.80%
5Y*
62.01%
10Y*
51.08%

HYMC

1D
2.26%
1M
-34.55%
YTD
8.37%
6M
92.24%
1Y
732.31%
3Y*
98.71%
5Y*
-6.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STX vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
STX
Seagate Technology plc
238.67%225.26%4.06%69.12%-51.42%87.50%10.14%62.14%-32.50%
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
8.37%975.57%-9.80%-53.96%-13.30%-92.18%-24.03%4.59%3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between STX and HYMC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STX:

$212.28B

HYMC:

$2.31B

EPS

STX:

$10.58

HYMC:

-$1.64

PB Ratio

STX:

193.86

HYMC:

10.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

STX:

$11.01B

HYMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

STX:

$4.57B

HYMC:

-$4.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

STX:

$2.59B

HYMC:

-$69.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STX vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STX
STX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
STX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
STX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
STX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
STX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STX vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seagate Technology plc (STX) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXHYMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.51

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

31.15

11.29

+19.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

90.13

30.24

+59.89

STX vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STX Sharpe Ratio is 10.19, which is higher than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 5.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STX and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STX vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STX drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STX and HYMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXHYMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.74%

-98.89%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.00%

-58.77%

+37.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.00%

-63.45%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.99%

-94.96%

+37.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-83.72%

+82.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.44%

-63.36%

+36.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

21.95%

-14.71%

Volatility

STX vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Seagate Technology plc (STX) is 19.61%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 24.71%. This indicates that STX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXHYMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.61%

24.71%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.59%

95.63%

-45.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.18%

120.00%

-55.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.86%

152.60%

-107.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.27%

122.97%

-80.70%

Dividends

STX vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

STX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STX
Seagate Technology plc
0.31%1.05%3.27%3.28%5.32%2.40%4.21%4.27%6.53%6.02%6.60%6.14%

Financials

STX vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seagate Technology plc and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
3.11B
0
(STX) Total Revenue
(HYMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


STX and HYMC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMC has higher volatility (24.71%) compared to STX (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STX dropped -88.74% vs HYMC's -98.89%.

STX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.19 vs 5.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STX and HYMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer