STTK vs. XRH0.L

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

STTK (Shattuck Labs, Inc.) is a stock, while XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) is Metals fund tracking the Rhodium. Over the past 5 years, STTK returned -24.85%/yr vs -15.19%/yr for XRH0.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

STTK vs. XRH0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STTK achieves a 90.14% return, which is significantly higher than XRH0.L's -28.17% return.

STTK

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 16.64%
• YTD: 90.14%
• 6M: 92.78%
• 1Y: 776.48%
• 3Y*: 30.54%
• 5Y*: -24.85%
• 10Y*: —

XRH0.L

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: -28.17%
• 6M: -23.84%
• 1Y: 40.60%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: -15.19%
• 10Y*: 27.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STTK vs. XRH0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
STTK Shattuck Labs, Inc.	90.14%	201.65%	-83.03%	210.00%	-72.97%	-83.76%	137.15%
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	-28.17%	205.23%	-14.69%	-60.81%	-4.46%	-15.51%	27.00%

Correlation

The correlation between STTK and XRH0.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020	-0.01

Return for Risk

STTK vs. XRH0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STTK

STTK Risk / Return Rank: 98
STTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
STTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
STTK Omega Ratio Rank: 97
STTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
STTK Martin Ratio Rank: 99

XRH0.L

XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STTK vs. XRH0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STTK	XRH0.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.69	0.45	+7.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.02	1.33	+3.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.17	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.52	1.00	+14.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	46.03	1.91	+44.12

STTK vs. XRH0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STTK Sharpe Ratio is 7.69, which is higher than the XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STTK and XRH0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STTK vs. XRH0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STTK drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than XRH0.L's maximum drawdown of -85.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STTK and XRH0.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	STTK	XRH0.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.73%	-85.90%	-12.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.51%	-40.30%	-10.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.45%	-46.87%	-46.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.43%	-81.27%	-16.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.95%	-67.56%	-20.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.15%	-50.59%	-32.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.00%	21.21%	-4.21%

Volatility

STTK vs. XRH0.L - Volatility Comparison

Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) has a higher volatility of 37.80% compared to Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) at 28.09%. This indicates that STTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRH0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STTK	XRH0.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.80%	28.09%	+9.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.42%	70.45%	-12.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.28%	89.78%	+12.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.14%	69.02%	+49.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.53%	66.84%	+47.69%

Dividends

STTK vs. XRH0.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither STTK nor XRH0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STTK and XRH0.L in my portfolio?

STTK and XRH0.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.