STTK vs. HYMC
STTK (Shattuck Labs, Inc.) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. STTK operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, STTK returned -28.54%/yr vs -4.90%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STTK vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STTK achieves a 43.56% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 5.38% return.
STTK
- 1D
- 5.86%
- 1M
- -14.10%
- YTD
- 43.56%
- 6M
- 66.88%
- 1Y
- 447.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- -28.54%
- 10Y*
- —
HYMC
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -22.49%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 647.76%
- 3Y*
- 99.81%
- 5Y*
- -4.90%
- 10Y*
- —
STTK vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STTK Shattuck Labs, Inc. | 43.56% | 201.65% | -83.03% | 210.00% | -72.97% | -83.76% | 137.15% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 5.38% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between STTK and HYMC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
STTK:
$588.11M
HYMC:
$2.25B
STTK:
-$0.59
HYMC:
-$1.64
STTK:
6.14
HYMC:
10.04
STTK:
$1.00M
HYMC:
$0.00
STTK:
-$835.00K
HYMC:
-$4.65M
STTK:
-$48.60M
HYMC:
-$69.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STTK vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
STTK
HYMC
STTK vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STTK | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.94 | 11.12 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.51 | 28.21 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STTK vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STTK drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STTK and HYMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STTK | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -98.89% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.51% | -58.77% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.45% | -63.45% | -30.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.47% | -94.45% | -3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.90% | -84.17% | -6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -63.41% | -19.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.38% | 23.14% | -4.76% |
Volatility
STTK vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) has a higher volatility of 34.31% compared to Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) at 24.25%. This indicates that STTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STTK | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.31% | 24.25% | +10.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.96% | 95.62% | -38.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.90% | 118.15% | -15.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.01% | 152.73% | -34.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.57% | 122.88% | -8.31% |
Dividends
STTK vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
Neither STTK nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
STTK vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shattuck Labs, Inc. and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
STTK and HYMC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STTK has higher volatility (34.31%) compared to HYMC (24.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STTK dropped -98.73% vs HYMC's -98.89%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.54 vs 4.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STTK and HYMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer