PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRV vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STRV vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 500 ETF (STRV) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRV achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.


STRV

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.39%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.91%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRV vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STRV
Strive 500 ETF
10.98%17.95%25.13%27.70%-1.96%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between STRV and QUS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022

0.90

The correlation between STRV and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

STRV vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STRV
QUS

Technology

38.6%
26.3%

Communication Services

11.1%
10.2%

Financial Services

10.8%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
5.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
13.4%

Industrials

7.9%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
9.2%

Energy

3.2%
4.6%

Utilities

2.0%
3.6%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.4%

Technology

STRV
38.6%
QUS
26.3%

Communication Services

STRV
11.1%
QUS
10.2%

Financial Services

STRV
10.8%
QUS
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

STRV
10.0%
QUS
5.8%

Healthcare

STRV
8.5%
QUS
13.4%

Industrials

STRV
7.9%
QUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

STRV
4.5%
QUS
9.2%

Energy

STRV
3.2%
QUS
4.6%

Utilities

STRV
2.0%
QUS
3.6%

Basic Materials

STRV
1.7%
QUS
2.3%

Real Estate

STRV
1.7%
QUS
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRV vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRV
STRV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
STRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
STRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRV vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 500 ETF (STRV) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STRVQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.59

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

11.54

+2.25

STRV vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRV Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRV and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STRVQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.95

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.77

+0.56

Drawdowns

STRV vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRV drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRV and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRVQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-33.78%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-6.85%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-13.94%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.50%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-3.70%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.53%

+0.52%

Volatility

STRV vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Strive 500 ETF (STRV) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that STRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRVQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

1.78%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

6.66%

+2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

9.09%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

14.33%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

16.42%

-0.32%

STRV vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

STRV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STRV vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

STRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%
STRV
Strive 500 ETF
1.02%1.05%1.13%1.21%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STRV and QUS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRV has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRV dropped -19.00% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 3-year performance, STRV leads with 22.74% vs 17.53% for QUS. On fees, STRV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STRV has performed better with a 22.74% return vs 17.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STRV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.02% for STRV.

STRV tracks Bloomberg US Large Cap Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Strive and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for STRV and 0.15% for QUS.

STRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRV and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer