STRL vs. T
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 67.37%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for T. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 180.50% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed T with an annualized return of 67.37%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 180.50%
- 6M
- 172.57%
- 1Y
- 323.17%
- 3Y*
- 152.83%
- 5Y*
- 104.12%
- 10Y*
- 67.37%
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
STRL vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 180.50% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and T is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.13 |
The correlation between STRL and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$11.19
T:
$3.04
STRL:
76.77
T:
7.74
STRL:
1.63
T:
0.32
STRL:
9.22
T:
1.35
STRL:
$2.88B
T:
$125.65B
STRL:
$664.66M
T:
$105.41B
STRL:
$429.99M
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
T
STRL vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 0.92 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.41 | -0.59 | +11.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.52 | -1.22 | +29.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -64.15% | -28.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -21.87% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -21.87% | -25.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -32.01% | -15.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -42.35% | -17.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.56% | -18.12% | +4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -15.72% | -30.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.30% | 10.64% | +0.66% |
Volatility
STRL vs. T - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 27.60% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.21%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.60% | 8.21% | +19.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.26% | 17.80% | +47.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.41% | 22.13% | +60.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.29% | 24.01% | +33.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 23.73% | +29.85% |
Dividends
STRL vs. T - Dividend Comparison
STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
STRL vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and T have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (27.60%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs T's -64.15%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer