STRL vs. SPMO
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) is a stock, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 67.37%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 180.50% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 67.37%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.86% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 180.50%
- 6M
- 172.57%
- 1Y
- 320.41%
- 3Y*
- 152.83%
- 5Y*
- 104.12%
- 10Y*
- 67.37%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
STRL vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 180.50% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and SPMO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, STRL and SPMO have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
SPMO
STRL vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.41 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.41 | 3.44 | +6.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.52 | 13.01 | +15.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -30.95% | -61.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -12.70% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -20.13% | -27.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -22.74% | -24.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -30.95% | -28.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.56% | -1.68% | -11.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -4.60% | -41.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.30% | 3.35% | +7.95% |
Volatility
STRL vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 27.60% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.29%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.60% | 10.29% | +17.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.26% | 16.73% | +48.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.41% | 19.48% | +62.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.29% | 19.65% | +37.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 20.48% | +33.10% |
Dividends
STRL vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and SPMO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (27.60%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer