STRL vs. NBIG
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) is a stock, while NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 180.50% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 354.99% return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 180.50%
- 6M
- 172.57%
- 1Y
- 323.17%
- 3Y*
- 152.83%
- 5Y*
- 104.12%
- 10Y*
- 67.37%
NBIG
- 1D
- 8.60%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 354.99%
- 6M
- 298.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STRL vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 180.50% | -19.22% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 354.99% | -59.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and NBIG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STRL vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -75.83% | -16.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.56% | -25.62% | +12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -42.11% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.30% | — | — |
Volatility
STRL vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.41% | 200.15% | -117.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.29% | 200.15% | -142.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 200.15% | -146.57% |
Dividends
STRL vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and NBIG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for STRL and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer