PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRL vs. KNSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STRL vs. KNSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 181.45% return, which is significantly higher than KNSA's 33.60% return.


STRL

1D
2.82%
1M
17.59%
YTD
181.45%
6M
179.31%
1Y
295.41%
3Y*
155.19%
5Y*
108.54%
10Y*
66.93%

KNSA

1D
1.66%
1M
3.51%
YTD
33.60%
6M
27.60%
1Y
93.78%
3Y*
52.43%
5Y*
29.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRL vs. KNSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
181.45%81.79%91.57%168.08%24.71%41.32%32.17%29.29%-13.57%
KNSA
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
33.60%108.54%12.77%17.09%27.27%-33.39%59.76%-60.63%14.89%

Correlation

The correlation between STRL and KNSA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2018

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STRL:

$26.75B

KNSA:

$4.54B

EPS

STRL:

$11.19

KNSA:

$0.92

PE Ratio

STRL:

77.03

KNSA:

59.85

PEG Ratio

STRL:

1.64

KNSA:

0.58

PS Ratio

STRL:

9.26

KNSA:

5.80

PB Ratio

STRL:

22.49

KNSA:

7.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

STRL:

$2.88B

KNSA:

$754.05M

Gross Profit (TTM)

STRL:

$664.66M

KNSA:

$294.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

STRL:

$429.99M

KNSA:

$101.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRL vs. KNSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

KNSA
KNSA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
KNSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNSA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
KNSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNSA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRL vs. KNSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STRLKNSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.41

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.25

4.63

+4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.05

16.35

+8.70

STRL vs. KNSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRL Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the KNSA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRL and KNSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STRL vs. KNSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than KNSA's maximum drawdown of -83.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and KNSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRLKNSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-83.06%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.02%

-21.12%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.67%

-34.14%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.67%

-53.17%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.27%

-7.35%

-5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-40.60%

-5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.43%

5.97%

+5.46%

Volatility

STRL vs. KNSA - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 24.34% compared to Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA) at 10.40%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRLKNSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.34%

10.40%

+13.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.80%

34.02%

+30.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.30%

43.03%

+39.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.26%

53.48%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.55%

63.93%

-10.38%

Dividends

STRL vs. KNSA - Dividend Comparison

Neither STRL nor KNSA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

STRL vs. KNSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
825.68M
214.27M
(STRL) Total Revenue
(KNSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STRL vs. KNSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
23.5%
0
Portfolio components
STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

KNSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

KNSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported an operating income of 29.27M and revenue of 214.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

KNSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. reported a net income of 22.59M and revenue of 214.27M, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STRL and KNSA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRL has higher volatility (24.34%) compared to KNSA (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs KNSA's -83.06%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRL and KNSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer