PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRL vs. BKV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STRL vs. BKV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and BKV Corp (BKV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 94.88% return, which is significantly higher than BKV's -9.91% return.


STRL

1D
2.76%
1M
-23.15%
6M
66.74%
YTD
94.88%
1Y
123.02%
3Y*
111.61%
5Y*
93.57%
10Y*
58.67%
ALL TIME*
19.99%

BKV

1D
1.62%
1M
-10.07%
6M
-17.78%
YTD
-9.91%
1Y
18.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.05M$20.19M$22.46M
$512.00M$493.44M$636.07M

STRL vs. BKV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
94.88%81.79%15.42%
BKV
BKV Corp
-9.91%14.17%28.19%

Correlation

The correlation between STRL and BKV is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STRL:

$18.31B

BKV:

$2.68B

EPS

STRL:

$11.16

BKV:

$3.17

PE Ratio

STRL:

53.46

BKV:

7.73

PS Ratio

STRL:

6.42

BKV:

2.11

PB Ratio

STRL:

15.57

BKV:

1.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

STRL:

$2.88B

BKV:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STRL:

$664.66M

BKV:

$693.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

STRL:

$429.99M

BKV:

$544.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRL vs. BKV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BKV
BKV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BKV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BKV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STRL vs. BKV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and BKV Corp (BKV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STRLBKVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.11

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

0.68

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

1.68

+6.32

STRL vs. BKV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRL Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the BKV Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRL and BKV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STRL vs. BKV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than BKV's maximum drawdown of -39.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and BKV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRLBKVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-39.98%

-52.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.26%

-27.52%

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.95%

-23.94%

-16.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.20%

-12.15%

-34.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.44%

11.07%

+4.37%

Volatility

STRL vs. BKV - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 31.97% compared to BKV Corp (BKV) at 10.10%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRLBKVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.97%

10.10%

+21.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.75%

26.67%

+45.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.81%

41.73%

+47.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.94%

42.88%

+16.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.66%

42.88%

+11.78%

Dividends

STRL vs. BKV - Dividend Comparison

Neither STRL nor BKV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

STRL vs. BKV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and BKV Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

STRL vs. BKV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and BKV Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

BKV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BKV Corp reported a gross profit of 405.49M and revenue of 432.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.7%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

BKV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BKV Corp reported an operating income of 86.03M and revenue of 432.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

BKV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BKV Corp reported a net income of 44.08M and revenue of 432.85M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STRL and BKV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STRL has higher volatility (31.97%) compared to BKV (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs BKV's -39.98%.

STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRL and BKV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer