STRL vs. BE
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) and BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — STRL in Engineering & Construction, BE in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 5 years, STRL returned 108.54%/yr vs 67.90%/yr for BE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. BE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 181.45% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 278.54% return.
STRL
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- 17.59%
- YTD
- 181.45%
- 6M
- 179.31%
- 1Y
- 295.41%
- 3Y*
- 155.19%
- 5Y*
- 108.54%
- 10Y*
- 66.93%
BE
- 1D
- 15.41%
- 1M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- 278.54%
- 6M
- 270.31%
- 1Y
- 1,412.23%
- 3Y*
- 167.62%
- 5Y*
- 67.90%
- 10Y*
- —
STRL vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 181.45% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -18.85% |
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 278.54% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -46.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and BE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.35 |
The correlation between STRL and BE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$26.75B
BE:
$105.16B
STRL:
$11.19
BE:
$0.02
STRL:
77.03
BE:
14.32K
STRL:
9.26
BE:
35.28
STRL:
22.49
BE:
114.12
STRL:
$2.88B
BE:
$2.45B
STRL:
$664.66M
BE:
$761.91M
STRL:
$429.99M
BE:
$88.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
BE
STRL vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRL | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.69 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.25 | 31.49 | -22.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.05 | 97.57 | -72.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRL vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BE drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and BE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -92.54% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -45.94% | +14.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -53.42% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -75.87% | +28.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.27% | 0.00% | -13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.27% | -51.82% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.43% | 14.80% | -3.37% |
Volatility
STRL vs. BE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) is 24.34%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 29.00%. This indicates that STRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.34% | 29.00% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.80% | 74.92% | -10.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.30% | 108.23% | -25.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.26% | 86.25% | -28.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 95.75% | -42.20% |
Dividends
STRL vs. BE - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor BE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
STRL vs. BE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. BE - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
BE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
BE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
BE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and BE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (29.00%) compared to STRL (24.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs BE's -92.54%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.37 vs 3.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and BE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer