STPZ vs. VTP
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP).
STPZ and VTP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). It was launched on Aug 20, 2009. VTP is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. It was launched on Jul 7, 2025. Both STPZ and VTP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
STPZ vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STPZ vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 0.83% | 1.88% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 0.38% | 2.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STPZ achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 0.38% return.
STPZ
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
VTP
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STPZ vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
STPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
STPZ vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
STPZ
VTP
STPZ vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STPZ | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STPZ | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.11 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between STPZ and VTP is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
STPZ vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than VTP's 1.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 3.59% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
STPZ vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STPZ drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPZ and VTP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STPZ | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -1.92% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.31% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -0.53% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility
STPZ vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STPZ | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38% | 3.33% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 3.33% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 3.33% | -0.35% |