STPZ vs. VTP
STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - STPZ tracks the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y) while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STPZ charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
STPZ vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STPZ achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 1.55% return.
STPZ
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STPZ vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 1.79% | 1.88% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between STPZ and VTP is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STPZ vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
STPZ
VTP
STPZ vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STPZ | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STPZ | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.31 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
STPZ vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STPZ drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPZ and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STPZ | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -1.92% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.30% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -0.52% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | — | — |
Volatility
STPZ vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STPZ | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83% | 3.26% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.29% | 3.26% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 3.26% | -0.28% |
STPZ vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
STPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STPZ vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.10% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STPZ and VTP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for STPZ.
STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
STPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y), while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for STPZ and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for STPZ and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer