STOT vs. ZTWO
Compare and contrast key facts about State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO).
STOT and ZTWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STOT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index. It was launched on Apr 13, 2016. ZTWO is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024. Both STOT and ZTWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
STOT vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STOT vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 0.35% | 5.56% | 0.24% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.29% | 5.49% | 0.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than ZTWO's 0.29% return.
STOT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ZTWO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STOT vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STOT vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank
STOT
ZTWO
STOT vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STOT | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 2.74 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | 4.28 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.60 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 4.56 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.75 | 20.63 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STOT | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.74 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 3.24 | -2.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between STOT and ZTWO is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
STOT vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison
STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than ZTWO's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 4.42% | 4.52% | 5.10% | 4.53% | 2.54% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 1.95% | 2.08% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.19% | 4.31% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
STOT vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and ZTWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STOT | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -0.93% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | -0.93% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.49% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -0.10% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.21% | +0.02% |
Volatility
STOT vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.48%, while F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STOT | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 0.61% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 0.89% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70% | 1.53% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 1.50% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 1.50% | +0.71% |