PortfoliosLab logo
ZTWO vs. ZTRE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ZTWO and ZTRE is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ZTWO vs. ZTRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZTWO:

3.75

ZTRE:

2.90

Sortino Ratio

ZTWO:

6.14

ZTRE:

4.59

Omega Ratio

ZTWO:

1.87

ZTRE:

1.61

Calmar Ratio

ZTWO:

9.79

ZTRE:

5.72

Martin Ratio

ZTWO:

29.95

ZTRE:

14.71

Ulcer Index

ZTWO:

0.22%

ZTRE:

0.49%

Daily Std Dev

ZTWO:

1.74%

ZTRE:

2.45%

Max Drawdown

ZTWO:

-0.67%

ZTRE:

-1.25%

Current Drawdown

ZTWO:

0.00%

ZTRE:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTWO achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than ZTRE's 2.82% return.


ZTWO

YTD

2.33%

1M

0.32%

6M

2.55%

1Y

6.33%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ZTRE

YTD

2.82%

1M

0.39%

6M

2.68%

1Y

6.84%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZTWO vs. ZTRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZTWO and ZTRE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZTWO vs. ZTRE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTWO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZTWO is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZTWO is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZTWO is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZTWO is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZTWO is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZTWO is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTRE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZTRE is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZTRE is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZTRE is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZTRE is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZTRE is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZTRE is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZTWO vs. ZTRE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZTWO Sharpe Ratio is 3.75, which is comparable to the ZTRE Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTWO and ZTRE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ZTWO vs. ZTRE - Dividend Comparison

ZTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than ZTRE's 4.66% yield.


Drawdowns

ZTWO vs. ZTRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTWO drawdown since its inception was -0.67%, smaller than the maximum ZTRE drawdown of -1.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTWO and ZTRE.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ZTWO vs. ZTRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) is 0.44%, while F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) has a volatility of 0.64%. This indicates that ZTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...