PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOT vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STOT vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, STOT has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 2.43%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.56% annualized return.


STOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.29%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.43%

BND

1D
0.11%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.57%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STOT vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
1.08%5.56%5.26%6.39%-3.75%0.27%2.43%4.40%0.95%1.71%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.49%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between STOT and BND is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2016

0.50

The correlation between STOT and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STOT vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOT
STOT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOT vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STOTBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.20

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

1.59

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.23

4.52

+17.72

STOT vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOT Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOT and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STOT vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STOTBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-18.58%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-2.68%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-5.92%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.07%

-17.91%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.07%

-18.58%

+12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-2.15%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-3.06%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.94%

-0.76%

Volatility

STOT vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.37%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STOTBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

1.08%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

2.77%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13%

3.74%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

6.03%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

5.53%

-3.33%

STOT vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

STOT vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
4.40%4.52%5.10%4.53%2.54%1.76%1.66%2.61%2.50%1.95%2.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STOT and BND have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to STOT (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOT dropped -6.07% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 10-year performance, STOT leads with 2.43% vs 1.56% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, STOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, STOT has performed better with a 2.43% return vs 1.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.

STOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.96% for BND.

STOT is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BND is Total Bond Market. STOT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for STOT and 0.03% for BND.

STOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STOT and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer