PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOT vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STOT vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, STOT has underperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 2.43%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.


STOT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
2.43%

SPYD

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.97%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STOT vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
0.97%5.56%5.26%6.39%-3.75%0.27%2.43%4.40%0.95%1.71%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
10.34%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between STOT and SPYD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016

0.05

The correlation between STOT and SPYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (10 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STOT vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STOT
SPYD

Communication Services

100.0%
5.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

16.3%

Energy

-

9.2%

Financial Services

-

12.1%

Healthcare

-

5.2%

Industrials

-

2.3%

Real Estate

-

25.8%

Technology

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

11.4%

Communication Services

STOT
100.0%
SPYD
5.1%

Basic Materials

STOT

-

SPYD
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

STOT

-

SPYD
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

STOT

-

SPYD
16.3%

Energy

STOT

-

SPYD
9.2%

Financial Services

STOT

-

SPYD
12.1%

Healthcare

STOT

-

SPYD
5.2%

Industrials

STOT

-

SPYD
2.3%

Real Estate

STOT

-

SPYD
25.8%

Technology

STOT

-

SPYD
2.7%

Utilities

STOT

-

SPYD
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STOT vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOT
STOT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
STOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOT vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STOTSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.24

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

2.33

+3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.02

6.77

+17.25

STOT vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOT Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOT and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STOTSPYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81

1.42

+2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.63

0.42

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.44

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.47

+0.65

Drawdowns

STOT vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STOTSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-46.42%

+40.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-7.05%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-16.13%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.07%

-22.25%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.07%

-46.42%

+40.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.11%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-6.17%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

2.43%

-2.25%

Volatility

STOT vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.33%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STOTSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

2.57%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

7.71%

-6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11%

11.62%

-10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

16.13%

-14.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

19.78%

-17.58%

STOT vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

STOT vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than SPYD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.21%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
4.41%4.52%5.10%4.53%2.54%1.76%1.66%2.61%2.50%1.95%2.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STOT and SPYD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYD has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to STOT (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STOT dropped -6.07% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, SPYD leads with 8.59% vs 2.43% for STOT. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, STOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYD has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.

STOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 4.21% for SPYD.

STOT is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPYD is S&P 500. STOT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for STOT and 0.07% for SPYD.

STOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STOT and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer