STOT vs. FLTB
Compare and contrast key facts about State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB).
STOT and FLTB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STOT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index. It was launched on Apr 13, 2016. FLTB is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014.
Performance
STOT vs. FLTB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STOT vs. FLTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 0.35% | 5.56% | 5.26% | 6.39% | -3.75% | 0.27% | 2.43% | 4.40% | 0.95% | 1.71% |
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 0.14% | 6.60% | 5.14% | 5.94% | -5.88% | -1.20% | 5.57% | 5.87% | 1.06% | 2.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than FLTB's 0.14% return.
STOT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTB
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STOT vs. FLTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STOT vs. FLTB — Risk / Return Rank
STOT
FLTB
STOT vs. FLTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STOT | FLTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 1.99 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | 2.98 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.37 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 3.06 | +2.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.75 | 12.68 | +6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STOT | FLTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 1.99 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.60 | 0.80 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.82 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between STOT and FLTB is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
STOT vs. FLTB - Dividend Comparison
STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than FLTB's 4.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 4.42% | 4.52% | 5.10% | 4.53% | 2.54% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 0.00% |
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 4.37% | 4.31% | 4.11% | 3.20% | 1.63% | 0.89% | 1.56% | 2.67% | 2.50% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
STOT vs. FLTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, smaller than the maximum FLTB drawdown of -9.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and FLTB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STOT | FLTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -9.37% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | -1.52% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.07% | -9.26% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.95% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -1.41% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.37% | -0.14% |
Volatility
STOT vs. FLTB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.48%, while Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STOT | FLTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 0.97% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 1.50% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70% | 2.27% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 2.78% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 2.93% | -0.72% |