STOK vs. WM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM).

Performance

STOK vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

STOK vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
STOK Stoke Therapeutics, Inc.	2.58%	187.76%	109.70%	-43.01%	-61.53%	-61.26%	118.68%	10.75%
WM Waste Management, Inc.	5.00%	10.50%	14.28%	16.20%	-4.49%	43.82%	5.46%	0.48%

Fundamentals

EPS STOK : $0.69 WM : $6.70
PE Ratio STOK : 46.94 WM : 34.31
PS Ratio STOK : 9.26 WM : 3.69
Total Revenue (TTM) STOK : $205.63M WM : $25.20B
Gross Profit (TTM) STOK : $204.64M WM : $7.33B
EBITDA (TTM) STOK : $33.10M WM : $7.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOK achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 5.00% return.

STOK

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: -10.57%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 6M: 38.55%
• 1Y: 389.62%
• 3Y*: 57.52%
• 5Y*: -3.71%
• 10Y*: —

WM

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 0.76%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 16.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

STOK vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOK

STOK Risk / Return Rank: 98
STOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
STOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
STOK Omega Ratio Rank: 97
STOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
STOK Martin Ratio Rank: 99

WM

WM Risk / Return Rank: 41
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 35
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOK vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STOK	WM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.66	0.04	+5.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.72	0.18	+4.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.02	+0.59
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.46	0.13	+9.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	33.64	0.31	+33.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STOK vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOK Sharpe Ratio is 5.66, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOK and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STOK	WM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.66	0.04	+5.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	0.77	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.37	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between STOK and WM is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

STOK vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

STOK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
STOK Stoke Therapeutics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WM Waste Management, Inc.	1.49%	1.50%	1.49%	1.56%	1.66%	1.38%	1.85%	1.80%	2.09%	1.97%	2.31%	2.89%

Drawdowns

STOK vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOK drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOK and WM.

Drawdown Indicators

	STOK	WM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.17%	-77.85%	-17.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.16%	-18.14%	-19.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.80%	-18.14%	-73.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.36%	-6.41%	-46.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.55%	-17.74%	-44.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.45%	7.53%	+2.92%

Volatility

STOK vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 5.94%. This indicates that STOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STOK	WM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.33%	5.94%	+14.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.97%	13.99%	+36.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.93%	19.06%	+50.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.13%	18.30%	+62.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.20%	19.38%	+61.82%

Financials