PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STN.TO vs. EFR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Stantec Inc. (STN.TO) and Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STN.TO achieves a -21.79% return, which is significantly lower than EFR.TO's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, STN.TO has underperformed EFR.TO with an annualized return of 13.40%, while EFR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.


STN.TO

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
-21.79%
6M
-21.25%
1Y
-29.73%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
13.40%

EFR.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
-17.03%
YTD
5.89%
6M
4.83%
1Y
175.16%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
21.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STN.TO
Stantec Inc.
-21.79%15.61%6.81%65.43%-7.62%74.09%14.27%24.95%-13.44%5.18%
EFR.TO
Energy Fuels Inc.
5.89%169.01%-22.21%13.37%-13.25%78.89%117.74%-35.92%71.24%2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between STN.TO and EFR.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STN.TO:

CA$11.53B

EFR.TO:

CA$5.08B

EPS

STN.TO:

CA$4.30

EFR.TO:

-$0.30

PS Ratio

STN.TO:

1.46

EFR.TO:

41.45

PB Ratio

STN.TO:

3.42

EFR.TO:

5.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

STN.TO:

CA$7.92B

EFR.TO:

$84.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

STN.TO:

CA$3.40B

EFR.TO:

$25.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

STN.TO:

CA$1.13B

EFR.TO:

-$72.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STN.TO
STN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
STN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
STN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
STN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
STN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EFR.TO
EFR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EFR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EFR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stantec Inc. (STN.TO) and Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STN.TOEFR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.30

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

3.70

-4.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.80

7.20

-9.00

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the EFR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STN.TO and EFR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STN.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, smaller than the maximum EFR.TO drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STN.TO and EFR.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STN.TOEFR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.12%

-99.57%

+41.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.04%

-51.09%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.04%

-59.28%

+22.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.04%

-64.59%

+27.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-78.32%

+41.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.09%

-92.13%

+56.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.02%

-91.43%

+78.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.04%

26.24%

-9.20%

Volatility

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stantec Inc. (STN.TO) is 11.67%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a volatility of 29.13%. This indicates that STN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STN.TOEFR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.67%

29.13%

-17.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.89%

66.37%

-42.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.73%

97.73%

-70.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.79%

71.77%

-47.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.86%

70.81%

-46.95%

Dividends

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Dividend Comparison

STN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while EFR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFR.TO
Energy Fuels Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STN.TO
Stantec Inc.
0.91%0.69%0.74%0.73%1.11%0.93%1.50%1.58%1.84%1.42%1.33%1.22%

Financials

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stantec Inc. and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.07B
35.84M
(STN.TO) Total Revenue
(EFR.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. STN.TO values in CAD, EFR.TO values in USD

STN.TO vs. EFR.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stantec Inc. and Energy Fuels Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.6%
40.1%
Portfolio components
STN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc. reported a gross profit of 819.30M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

EFR.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

STN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc. reported an operating income of 174.60M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

EFR.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -14.55M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.

STN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc. reported a net income of 110.80M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

EFR.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STN.TO and EFR.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STN.TO and EFR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer