PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STMSX vs. ECAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STMSX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STMSX achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's 11.23% return.


STMSX

1D
1.05%
1M
2.23%
YTD
13.21%
6M
13.30%
1Y
26.59%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.35%

ECAT

1D
-1.20%
1M
6.84%
YTD
11.23%
6M
9.37%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STMSX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STMSX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund
13.21%8.67%13.34%12.97%-16.91%5.28%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
11.23%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between STMSX and ECAT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.65

The correlation between STMSX and ECAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STMSX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STMSX
STMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
STMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
STMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
STMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
STMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STMSX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STMSXECATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

1.77

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

6.65

+3.49

STMSX vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STMSX and ECAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STMSXECATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.56

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.55

-0.20

Drawdowns

STMSX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.78%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STMSX and ECAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STMSXECATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.78%

-32.23%

-28.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-11.80%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.36%

-15.79%

-18.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-1.20%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-9.11%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.14%

-0.37%

Volatility

STMSX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund (STMSX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) at 3.31%. This indicates that STMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STMSXECATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

3.31%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

10.59%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

13.44%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

16.90%

+6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

16.90%

+5.98%

STMSX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

STMSX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

STMSX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

STMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than ECAT's 21.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
21.71%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STMSX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Fund
3.82%4.41%21.88%3.11%0.84%9.68%0.29%2.54%9.26%1.89%0.41%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


STMSX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STMSX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to ECAT (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STMSX dropped -60.78% vs ECAT's -32.23%.

STMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STMSX and ECAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer